© 2000 by CSF Associates Inc.
Federalism and the Safety Net: Delinkage and Participation Rates
State University of New York at Albany
Since the enactment of welfare reform legislation in 1996, the federal government and the states have emphasized putting the needy to work and reducing caseloads. Simultaneously, however, national policymakers delinked eligibility for cash assistance from eligibility for other safety-net benefits. Contrary to stated policy, though, this delinkage has led to declining participation in the case of Food Stamps and health-insurance programs for low-income children. We highlight four factors that states must shape if they are to narrow this gap between policy promise and program performance by fostering higher participation. We show how our focus intersects with enduring questions of American federalism—the level of state commitment to redistributive programs, their capacity to implement these programs effectively, and the degree to which states can augment governing capacity by becoming more genuine laboratories of democracy.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Fossett and F. J. Thompson Administrative Responsiveness to the Disadvantaged: The Case of Children's Health Insurance J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2006; 16(3): 369 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|